Question about wording in baptismal record
Hello,
Hope everyone is well.
Recently, I came across a baptismal record and wanted to make sure I am reading it correctly:
Usually, I see padrinos who are married couples or who have some known kinship to one another (father/daughter, siblings, mother/son, etc.). I have only encountered unrelated padrinos a handful of times.
So, my reading is that Marcos de Vargas—possibly the same person as Marcos de Pedrosa, and identified here as the son of Santiago de Pedrosa—was the padrino, while Casilda, who apparently lived on the same estancia as Sebastian and Sebastiana (belonging to Alonso de Alba), was the madrina.
Should I be reading more into this arrangement?
One possibility I have considered is that Casilda was an illegitimate daughter of Alonso de Alba (and the word "hija" was accidentally
Comments
Greetings! I read it as follows... The event is for Margarita, her parents are housekeepers for Alonso de Alva. Marcos de Vargas, son of Santiago de Pedroza was the Godfather. Casilda, a mulata of the same Alsonso de Alva.
- Do Marcos and Casilda have a relationship? They might, or they might be meaningful choices for Margarita. It was not uncommon to ask the household hierarchy to be a Godparent to a child if the relations were good between castes.
- Alonso Alva might own Casilda, or she might be a daughter of mixed race, or both.
All scenarios might be worth investigating.
I read it as you do: “the godparents were Marcos de Vargas, son of Santiago de Pedrosa; and Casilda, mulata [?] del dicho Alonso de Alva.”
I think the missing word is “criada” - though possibly “esclava,” but my bet is the former, since there was a Casilda de Alba, mulata libre, who was married to Francisco Vasquez, mulato criado de Esteban de Anda. They had about 7 children between 1643 and 1664. She would’ve been born around the same time as Casilda mulata:
https://www.familysearch.org/en/tree/person/details/MSH3-SSY
Saludos!
Manny Díez Hermosillo
Greetings! I read it as…