Salvador De Rubalcaba about 1650

Can anyone help, I am looking for information on Salvador De Rubalcaba, born about 1650, married to Juana Gutierrez. They had a son, Balthazar De Rubalcaba y Gutierrez in 1678, Teocaltiche, Jalisco.

Strategy for finding the Informacion Matrimonial Calvillo, Ags.

I have a marrige from august 16 1832 in Calvillo, Ags. I have trouble trying to decide how early before to look for the Informacion Matrimonial. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Comments

Comment

Announcements (banns) are supposed to be made three consecutive Sundays prior to the wedding, so this suggests at least three weeks prior. However, I've also seen the informacion matrimonial much closer to the wedding.

If a dispensation is needed, it could be months prior.

Thus, I think 6 weeks prior is a good time to start; if you don't find anything, try 2 or 3 months prior to that.

If the informacion matrimonial is not found, it is also possible that it was done in a different parish if one of the partners was not from the parish where the wedding took place.

George Fulton
Pleasanton, CA

AGN

Hello, I was just wondering if anyone has written to the AGN in MX before with any results? Did you receive a response to your query ?

Thanks!

Kristine

Comments

Comment

Earlier this year I e-mailed them asking if they had copies of the documents of the Mexico City Archive Carlos Sigüenza & Góngora and they replied they didn't.

I also went to the AGN in order to see if they had more Mexican microfilms than the LDS (familysearch), but turns out they have the same ones.

Regards,
Victoriano Navarro

In reply to by victorianonavarro (not verified)

Comment

Oh ok... I have emailed them a couple weeks ago and so far no response yet.

Thanks for the reply!

Kristine

DNA Testing

Is there a separate "area," on NR for posting dna test results?
Pat Silva Corbera

Comments

Comment

Hello Edward,

The books on DNA testing are outdated and don't do proper comparisons or
explanations. DNA testing is a new field and advances are happening too
rapidly. Learning is done through websites and blogs.

Ancestry.com and Family Finder do autosomal testing. Autosomal testing
looks at the DNA that you inherited from all of your ancestral lines. You
don't inherit autosomal DNA from all of your ancestors but you do inherit
autosomal DNA from all of your ancestors. It can be confusing and hard to
explain.The following site has charts that can somewhat explain what you
are wanting to know http://www.dnainheritance.kahikatea.net/autosomal.html

Family Finder is much better than Ancestry.com because it allows you to see
which chromosome you coincide with your matches. This allows for
triangulation in order to pinpoint which ancestors passed down that segment
of autosomal DNA. Family Finder also tells you how much autosomal DNA you
have in common. Anything less than 5.5 is called IBS Identity by State and
is insignificant.

Ancestry.com is also different than Family Finder which is also different
from 23andme which is also different than Geno 2.0. I prefer using the
Family Finder raw data and running it through the Dodecad Globe13 which
includes Amerindian testing and also has a source database. Only Globe13
and Geno 2.0 inlcude source population info. They are the most transparent
calculators. The names of the ancestral components of Globe13 closely match
those of Gen0 2.0. A program for using the Globe13 calculator is at
http://www.y-str.org/tools/diy-dodecad-wrapper/

You can download all of your Family Finder files by using
http://www.dnagedcom.com/FamilyTreeDNA/default.aspx

Y-DNA helps identify the paternal line and can provide matches on the
paternal line. If you relatives that you don't know their paternal then
they should get a Y-DNA test. The mtDNA is strictly the female line. If you
have relatives for which you can't identify the female line the mtDNA test
might help but since the mtDNA changes so slowly it is hard to identify how
two females are related. It is more for determining if it is Amerindian or
European.

If your relatives get an autosomal test it will help with triangulation.
http://dna-explained.com/2013/06/21/triangulation-for-autosomal-dna/

If you upload your raw Family Finder data to www.gedmatch.com you will be
able to triangulate with others once that feature is put back on the site.
It takes 6 weeks for the file to process so you want to get the file
uploaded as soon as possible.

You should also read the following presentation on autosomal testing
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/21841126/DNA.pptx

Regards,
Armando

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello my name is Edward Arce Luna I'm really new at this DNA testing,but I
would like
some information. I have done DNA testing on ancestry.com I did the
paternal and maternal testing I've also did family Finder DNA testing on
family tree DNA . I would like to get some of my siblings, uncles, aunts,
Tested. I'm not sure which test would benefit me, Would it be the
Paternal DNA or maternal or family finder testing.?Any books or any website
you
Can recommend that would give some basic information on the DNA testing
interpretations?
I have done the DNA testing on ancestry.com. Which is the paternal and
maternal.
I also done some DNA testing on family DNA. Now the family Finder DNA
results are somewhat different compared to the ancestry.com DNA testing I'm
a little confused!
Saludos
Edward Luna

Comment

I just noticed an error in my previous post. I was trying to write it all
too fast. The correction is "You don't inherit autosomal DNA from all of
your ancestors but you do inherit autosomal DNA segments from ancestors
that existed through any of your ancestral lines." I hope that makes more
sense especially with the content of the rest of the post.

As a brand new member...

I'd like to provide a brief introduction of my genealogy background for the membership at Nuestros Ranchos:

I began my mother's patrilineal genealogy research in June of 2010, and have been activel

Comments

Comment

Hi Consuelo, please see my family line as I have many Robalcaba (various spellings), Soto and Sanches from Teocaltiche, Arroyo Seco, Jalisco. Please let me know if you see any familiar names. I too have Robalacaba fom Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes.

Comment

Consuelo,

I do have some connections with the Udave family. While they are seemingly not related to me, they did marry into my husband's family the Bargas or Vargas from Teocaltiche but the Udave's I have originated in Villa Hidalgo and then moved to Nochistlan, Zac.

Will you by chance be attending the conference in Sacramento on Sept 14th. Nueva Galicia Genealogcial Society.
http://www.nuevagalicia.net/special_events/

You'd get to meet other members with common interests and from the same region and you and I could review and exchange information. There will be two speakers presenting on Nueva Galicia with a focus on our regions. I will contact you off-line.

Alicia

________________________________
From: Consuelo Udave
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:46 PM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] As a brand new member...

I'd like to provide a brief introduction of my genealogy background for the membership at Nuestros Ranchos:

I began my mother's patrilineal genealogy research in June of 2010, and have been actively researching and documenting our Udabe ancestors, particularly from the towns of Teocaltiche (1700-1800) and Villa Hidalgo (1800-1930), with an emphasis on Rancho Arroyo Seco, just outside of Villa Hidalgo (formerly known as-Paso de Sotos) in Jalisco.  My mothers's matrilineal lineage derives mostly from Calvillo, Aguascalientes, and possibly from Zacatecas.

I'm eager to find other researchers who might have ties to or any information regarding the following surnames-
Udabe (Udave, Eudave, Udavi, etc.), Esparza, Salas, Serna, Soto, Lopez, Rios, Aguallo, Rubalcava, Penalola, Ornelas, Romo, Reynoso, Rodriguez, Sanches, Arizmendes, Delgado, de la Serda-from the following locations: Teocaltiche, Paso de Sotos, Villa Hidalgo, and Rancho Arroyo Seco, in Jalisco, Mexico.

I'm also researching:
Penalosa, Salas, Martinez, Mondragon, Marin, Bargas, Rubio, Duron, Salasar, Ramirez, Marques, Robalcava-in Calvillo, Aguascalientes, Mexico.  I'm looking for  any information for Pablo Salas and Juana Mondragon, probably married in Aguascalientes, around the timeframe of 1840-1850, and their son, Magdaleno Salas, born about 1851…location unknown…but most likely in Aguascalientes, also.

I believe my mother's Udabe ancestor originated in the Basque areas of Spain, however, I've yet to identify or document any specific ancestral connections across the Atlantic.  I've located and "googled" a small village by the name of Udabe-Basaburua in the Pyrenees Mountains, and have been able to enjoy seeing a 360-degree view of it from the main road through town.  The countryside is quite beautiful and pastoral, from what I can see!

I'm willing to exchange information, and I do my own research and documentation.  I speak very little Spanish, but can read and understand "un poquito"- (especially with the help of online translation sites).  I was born and raised in the United States, and both of my parents (now deceased) spoke Spanish at home…so I'm not totally unfamiliar with the language.

I've followed the Nuestros Ranchos website for several years now-in the public forums and I very recently obtained N.R. membership.  I look forward to corresponding with the various researchers within the N. R. membership.

Sincerely,
Consuelo H. Udave
Bremerton, WA, USA

Comment

Welcome, I like your resume!

I know you'll accomplish your goals. We have a few common surnames that we're researching. Most of mine are from Jalisco and Zacatecas.

I have a free RootsWeb.com Family Tree that perhaps may help you. It's called "jalisco families" and this is the link

http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=jalisco_fa…

Jose Carlos de Leon

Comment

Hello Jose!

Thank you for the information re: your "jalisco families" link @ RootsWeb.com! I haven't checked it out completely just yet, but in a brief review of half a dozen surnames, I have not found any links...just yet. The bulk of my ancestors begin in Teocaltiche for the time period of 1700-1800. Then, they migrated to the Paso de Sotos area (later renamed Villa Hidalgo), where they remained for most of the next hundred years (at least as far as my research shows). The other side of my matrilineal lineage comes from Aguascalientes, Mexico...mostly the Calvillo area...going back about four generations.

I will review your website more closely for any possible links, but I do thank you for the welcome and web referral!

Consuelo Udave

Parents of Jose Joaquin de Leon

I have been trying for months and searching for my GGGrandfather, Jose Joaquin de Leon
born San Francisco del Rincon, Gto? around 1700? He was married to Sixta Hernandez.

Comments

Comment

They may or may not be related, since Autlán, Jalisco is a long way from San Francisco del Rincon, Gto (417 km), but I have found three generations of Juan de León in Autlán.

The first was married to Juana Franco

The second Juan de León, son of the of the first, married Juana de Medina 21 Nov 1738 in Autlán. That would put the first Juan de León as born ca.1688
assuming 25 yrs per generation. Here is the image of the marriage https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18522-1079-5?cc=1874591&wc=M….

The third Juan de León died 24 May 1788 in Autlán. He was the son of the second couple. Here is that image. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18531-30756-96?cc=1874591&wc…

I don{t know if it will help, but you never know. I just saw that the second Juan de León was from Guachinango, Jalisco which is a little closer toSan Francisco del Rincon (357 km).

Good luck!

Sergio Salés

Digging for original image for marriage record, Felipe Canal (1827), Unión de Tula, Jalisco

I would like to see if someone could help me out; for the Following record for Felipe Canal (married Benita Figueroa in Oct 28, 1827) in Union De Tula,Jalisco,Mexico - https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM

Comments

Comment

Your record must be in film 634739, Unión de Tula, Nuestra Señora del Rosario, "Bautismos 1828,1832-1850". Chances are the film also includes somewhere some marriages from 1827, even if it is not indicated in the description, you just have to go over the roll page by page.
If you go to image 100, for example, you will find baptisms from 1818, and on image 150 form 1822. These don't correspond to the original description of the roll. By image 250 you get to marriages from 1823, so your record must be a little further ahead.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-19033-45935-25?cc=1874591&wc…

Good luck,
Victoriano Navarro

Esparza, Martinez, Amador, Romo

Hello,

I was hoping to see if anyone is also researching some of the same families.
In the Nochistlan, Zacatecas and Teocaltiche, Jalisco areas are the following families:

Agapito Esparza married to Paulina Martinez

Comments

Comment

Angelica Iglesias Amador--I am also looking for some information on Bartola. and Victorio. My great grandfather was one of their kids. Crispin Amador, b 1890. He married Luisa Delgadillo. Did you find any more info on the Amador's or Romo's, specifically Victorio or Bartola? I hit a road block.

Family Search.org

Thank you everybody. I just put the capital letter M(exico) and and it worked . Muy strange ,but it worked.

thank you

Ronnie Reynoso pariente a casi todos de Los Altos

Comments

Comment

Hi
You would have thought they would have changed it (M) after our
conversation. It was giving them problems. I guess they 'forgot'.

MG

In a message dated 8/18/2013 11:58:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
chilerey@msn.com writes:

Thank you everybody. I just put the capital letter M(exico) and and it
worked . Muy strange ,but it worked.

thank you

Ronnie Reynoso pariente a casi todos de Los Altos

JUAN REZA

ALGUIEN TIENE LOS PADRES DE JUAN GUERRA REZA cc ANA MA. MAGDALENA -SALDIVAR y OÑATE MENDOZA EN ZACATECAS ? Y DE DONDE ERA ORIGINARIO?

can't find church record for jalisco found on familysearch.org

I have found an entry for my research, but am unable to find the image for a birth entry from the mid 1700's: Santa Maria de Los Lagos, Lagos de Moreno, Jalisco, Mexico
Please help.

Thanks

Comments

Comment

Jessica

Your query is somewhat vague.

I assume what you are saying is that you have found a reference for an extracted church record, but are having trouble finding the original.

The extracted records almost, but not always, give you the film number, for the record. The posted films often, but again not always, start with the film number. This will tell you if you are looking at the right film.

If the posted films do not have the number, then look up the film number in the FHL catalog, This will identify the film by the period covered so you can go to the right group of records at the website.

After than, the records should be in chronological order. That is usually true, but note that auxilliary chapels may have their records separate from the main parish records, often just a group at the end of each month. If the volume of records is in poor condition, the pages may be out of order.

Some of the apparently extracted records are actually from information submitted by individuals. These can be problematic. In some cases I have been able to find the original, in others, I have not.

Baptisms and marriages are sometimes in the same volume, but still usually separated (eg, first part is baptisms, followed by marriages).

In rare cases, there are errors in the extracted data. This complicates the search.

Good luck in you search.

George Fulton
Pleasanton, CA

Comment

Hola every one, I must be doing something wrong . I cannot get any results on familysearch.org

thanh you

Ronnie Reynoso

Comment

Hello Ronnie,
Do you mean you can't get any results when you do the inquiry or are you just hitting dead ends? If it is lack of inquiry results it may be that you typed in the country: mexico. Try just typing "M" and when you see a list of countries select "Mexico." It has to be capitalized. I'm not sure why, but this works for me.
Good luck,
Deedra Corona

Comment

Hi

Awhile back I had a problem....it was solved when I put in “Mexico” ...that was the only way I was able to get info. I checked with FamilySearch and was told that this had been giving them problems. It has to be a capital M and the rest lower case....

Mickey

Sent from Windows Mail

From: zapvive1@msn.com
Sent: ‎August‎ ‎17‎, ‎2013 ‎5‎:‎57‎ ‎PM
To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Results for Familysearch

Hello Ronnie,
Do you mean you can't get any results when you do the inquiry or are you just hitting dead ends? If it is lack of inquiry results it may be that you typed in the country: mexico. Try just typing "M" and when you see a list of countries select "Mexico." It has to be capitalized. I'm not sure why, but this works for me.
Good luck,
Deedra Corona

Comment

Don't feel bad...it's been up and down for the past three days.  Every time I'm in to start searching, it goes down.  Keep trying.....

 
Ann M. Gutierrez

>________________________________
> From: Ronald Reynoso
>To: "research@nuestrosranchos.org"
>Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 3:45 PM
>Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Familysearch.org
>
>
>Hola every one, I must be doing something wrong . I cannot get any results on familysearch.org
>
>thanh you
>
>Ronnie Reynoso
>                       

Comment

hmmm, I have found tons of stuff this week, haven't had any problems at all. I am usually on a couple of hours in the morning and then for about an hour after 11pm.

> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:57:11 -0700
> From: agutierrez07@sbcglobal.net
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Familysearch.org
>
> Don't feel bad...it's been up and down for the past three days. Every time I'm in to start searching, it goes down. Keep trying.....
>
>
> Ann M. Gutierrez
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Ronald Reynoso
> >To: "research@nuestrosranchos.org"
> >Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 3:45 PM
> >Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Familysearch.org
> >
> >
> >Hola every one, I must be doing something wrong . I cannot get any results on familysearch.org
> >
> >thanh you
> >
> >Ronnie Reynoso
> >

Comment

I don't know if this is related, but "Who Do You Think You Are?" started again. Last season, I often had problems with ancestry.com and familysearch.org during peak computer time so I think it may have something to do with high traffic to those sites. By 2:00 am, glitches were no longer there. I like the show and I like that it may spark interest in one's family history, but I don't like that it strains the websites.

Sherri Mora

Comment

Ronnie,

It's been a hit or a miss for me. At times it finds nothing and several hours later, it will be back up. Just keep trying at different hours.

Alicia

________________________________
From: Ronald Reynoso
To: "research@nuestrosranchos.org"
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 1:45 PM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Familysearch.org

Hola every one, I must be doing something wrong . I cannot get any results on familysearch.org

thanh you

Ronnie Reynoso
                       

Maria de Jesus Vargas y Joseph Rodriguez, Zapotlan el grande, Jalisco

hola,

Estoy atorada por favor ayudenme, no he trabajado mucha en esta línea, como
son apellidos comunes son mas dificiles de rastrear pero espero alguien me
pueda ayudar.

Estoy buscando a los

Comments

Comment

Hello Marta,

I don't have any information on your Joseph Rodriguez; however, I was wondering if you know who his wife's parents were ... I think one possibility is Miguel Vargas and Catarina Aguilar, if so we might have a common ancestor.

-Angelina-

Felipa Macias Valadez

Hola a todos.
He encontrado una ancestro llamado Felipa Macias Valadez, casada cerca de
1750 con Francisco Xavier Ladron de Guevara probablemente vivieron
cerca de Lagos de Moreno o Encarnacion de

Comments

Comment

Hola a todos.
He encontrado una ancestro llamado Felipa Macias Valadez, casada cerca de
1750 con Francisco Xavier Ladron de Guevara probablemente vivieron
cerca de Lagos de Moreno o Encarnacion de Diaz, no he podido avanzar mas en
esta rama, ¿algun miembro podra ayudarme indicandome donde buscar? o si
tienen un dato que me puedan dar acerca de esta pareja se lo agradecere
enormemente.

ATTE:
Mario Gonzalez.

Recording Racial Demographics in the 1800s

Hi, everyone!
I'm new here at Nuestros Ranchos and want to say thank you to everyone for sharing what you have. In just a few short weeks, I have learned tons and tons about my ancestry!!!

Comments

Comment

Hello, what a small world. I have also researched the family records of Zacoalco and have noticed the "v" and "Y"'s you mention. In Zacoalco this is more often seen starting around the second half of the 19th century. Before that, the parish priests used the usual racial terms as in other parishes: espanol, indio, mestizo, mulato, coyote, etc. Comparing my ancestors in Zacoalco, I have noticed that vecino encompasses all castes and indio, well just indio, native. At the turn of the 20th century, they stopped using those terms.

I agree that you shouldn't count these terms as actual proof of the race of our ancestors. They usually referred to physical appearance and sometimes, social status. One example, my 4th great grandfather Domingo Apodaca was married as a mestizo, (half espanol half indio) His wife was described as espanola, and their children became espanoles, except for one who was described mulato! As for Domingo, I found his death certificate and guess what, he was no longer a mestizo, but espanol! Anyways, use those terms as possible clues, but not as factual evidence.

By the way, what families are you researching in Zacoalco? I grew up in Zacoalco and many of my family lines are in Zacoalco and nearby Santa Catarina. Especifically in Zacoalco, I have the surnames Martinez, Rodriguez, Frias, Aguilar, Castro, and way back, Gonzales de la Campa. Check my family tree in the files section and see if anything sounds familiar.

Steve in NC

Comment

Hello, Steve,

Yes I have seen many of your ancestors in the indexes!!!

Thank you very much for replying. My great-grandfather was listed as yndio when born, but as not indigenous when married, or something like that. I understand now how confusing and inaccurate the whole process was. I was especially curious because once they immigrated to the United States, I'll bet it was up to the immigrant to identify ethnicity. I've seen old U.S. censuses that list another great-grandfather as Indian, then 10 years later Mexican for race.

Okay, now back to your family tree. I am in dire need of my link to Frias! My g-g-g grandmother was Cristina Frias, and I can't find records on her anywhere. I only got her name as being the grandmother listed in my great-grandmother's birth, or something like that.

Okay, I'll check your family tree, and hopefully can find something!

Thanks again,

Natalie

Comment

on the interaccila marriage legality, that depended on both parties economic classes, and parental approval. interracial marriage wasn't illegal per say, but if the wealthier parties's parents didn't want the marriage to happen, they can elgally prevent the marriage usually, since parental approval played a big role in marriages.

anyways you can't always rely on the racial categorizations in mexican records. they aren't always accurate.
http://www.nuestrosranchos.org/node/20614

Comment

Thank you, Katy!

I appreciate your explanation. It makes sense now what I have heard from my family. Thank you for the link to your previous discussions, as well! I read them all.

Take care,

Natalie

FW: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup I)

From: Angel R.

Comments

Comment

From: Angel R. Cervantes [mailto:angelrcervantes@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:44 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup I)

Hello,

I would like to invite you to attend a lecture on Anthropological Genetic
Genealogy: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup I).
If you would like to learn more about the mark this ancient civilization
made on the Iberian Peninsula then this presentation is for you. There will
be a presentation on the subject on July 22, through the University of New
Mexico Continuing Education program.

Here is a link to sign up for the presentation:

http://newmexico.augusoft.net/index.cfm?method=CourseSeries.CourseSerie…
stration
&CourseSeriesGroupId=76

Best Regards

Ángel de Cervantes
Project Administrator
New Mexico DNA Project
Iberian Peninsula DNA Project

Comment

I have a question for this project's administrator. Were all Visigoths
haplogroup I?

-----Original Message-----
From: general-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
[mailto:general-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph
Puentes
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:03 PM
To: general@nuestrosranchos.org; Ciudad_Juarez@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] FW: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican
Families (Haplogroup I)

From: Angel R. Cervantes [mailto:angelrcervantes@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:44 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup I)

Hello,

I would like to invite you to attend a lecture on Anthropological Genetic
Genealogy: The Visigoth Connection to New Mexican Families (Haplogroup I).
If you would like to learn more about the mark this ancient civilization
made on the Iberian Peninsula then this presentation is for you. There will
be a presentation on the subject on July 22, through the University of New
Mexico Continuing Education program.

Here is a link to sign up for the presentation:

http://newmexico.augusoft.net/index.cfm?method=CourseSeries.CourseSerie…
stration
&CourseSeriesGroupId=76

Best Regards

Ángel de Cervantes
Project Administrator
New Mexico DNA Project
Iberian Peninsula DNA Project

Comment

Barry Cunliffe, Peter Heather and Herwig Wolfram all agree that the "Visigoths" were a confederation of many tribes and nations with a Germanic ruling elite, they were not a homogeneous group. The nations that made up the "Visigothic" hordes at the time of the great migrations out of the Balkans were Alans, Sarmatians, Dacians and Thracians, Carpi and a Greek element as well as run away slaves of varying ethnicity. In essences, anyone who threw in their lot with them and was opposed to Roman rule was considered a "Visigoth".

The Germanic people who made up the Visigothic nation were the Tervingi and Greuthungi, and they were in the minority at the time these people entered Gaul and Iberia. The hordes were a heterogeneous nation of nations.

This study also seems to neglect the Germanic confederations who proceeded the Goths such as the Suevi and Vandals, the former seem a good candidate for this marker as well.

We are too quick to put a tribal label on DNA markers. Yes, the "I" marker is common to "Nordic"peoples, but it is also found in the Balkans ( I-M423). I-M26 is also found among the Basques, who never mingled with nor were conquered by the Visigoths.

In reply to by El Peregrino (not verified)

Comment

I agree that tribal labels should not be placed on haplogroups since there
is no way to know for sure how and when they arrived in Iberia. It is nice
to read that there are others that understand this. Haplogroup I is
estimated to be about 25,000 years old which by far predates any of the
Germanic cultures. A person of that haplogroup could have made it into
Iberia any time in those past 25,000 years speaking any of many languages
and part of any of many cultures. Even many subclades, not only those of
Haplogroup I, transcend ethnic and language groups and territories labeled
as belonging only to a certain group. The advent of farming and the bronze
age brought about a massive change in Europe and it could have been then
that the haplogroup made it into Iberia.

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:46 PM, wrote:

> Roger Collins, Peter Heather and Herwig Wolfram all agree that the
> "Visigoths" were a confederation of many tribes and nations with a Germanic
> ruling elite, they were not a homogeneous group. The nations that made up
> the "Visigothic" hordes at the time of the great migrations out of the
> Balkans were Alans, Sarmatians, Dacians and Thracians, Carpi and a Greek
> element as well as run away slaves of varying ethnicity. In essences,
> anyone who threw in their lot with them and was opposed to Roman rule was
> considered a "Visigoth".
>
> The Germanic people who made up the Visigothic nation were the Tervingi
> and Greuthungi, and they were in the minority at the time these people
> entered Gaul and Iberia. The hordes were a heterogeneous nation of nations.
>
> This study also seems to neglect the Germanic confederations who proceeded
> the Goths such as the Suevi and Vandals, the former seem a good candidate
> for this marker as well.
>
> We are too quick to put a tribal label on DNA markers. Yes, the "I" marker
> is common to "Nordic"peoples, but it is also found in the Balkans (
> I-M423). I-M26 is also found among the Basques, who never mingled with nor
> were conquered by the Visigoths. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> Nuestros Ranchos General Mailing List
>
> To post, send email to:
> general(at)nuestrosranchos.org
>
> To change your subscription, log on to:
> http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>

Comment

There is new evidence that there was trade between Iberia, Sardinia,
Austria, and Scandinavia long before the Visigoths. Haplogroup I could have
entered Iberia during the Nordic Bronze Age which was c. 1700–500 BC.

*The first part of this research published previously proved without doubt
that the metals dated to the Nordic Bronze Age found in Sweden were not
smelted from the local copper ores. In this second part we present a
detailed interpretation of these analytical data with the aim to identify
the ore sources from which these metals originated. The interpretation of
lead isotope and chemical data of 71 Swedish Bronze Age metals is based on
the direct comparisons between the lead isotope data and geochemistry of
ore deposits that are known to have produced copper in the Bronze Age. The
presented interpretations of chemical and lead isotope analyses of Swedish
metals dated to the Nordic Bronze Age are surprising and bring some
information not known from previous work. Apart from a steady supply of
copper from the Alpine ores in the North Tyrol, the main sources of copper
seem to be ores from the Iberian Peninsula and Sardinia. Thus from the
results presented here a new complex picture emerges of possible
connectivities and flows in the Bronze Age between Scandinavia and Europe .*
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440313002689

Huizares de Valparaíso

I have reached a dead end in my research on the Huizares of Tototiche which ends with a couple who lived in Valparaíso in the late 1700s.

Comments

Comment

Madera

The correct last name would be spelled, "Huizar" as there are a lot of people with that last name in Valparaiso and Huejuquilla.

But in the archives sometimes the recorder would mispell the name and could spell it "Guizar" like they would spell Valparaiso as "Balparaiso"

Have you tried the online archives:

https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list#page=1&region=MEXICO